Council Meeting

Held Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Host: Ms. Bonita White

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Ms. Delia L. Johnson, Co-Chair and Director, Office of Civil Rights for International Broadcasting Bureau, opened the meeting with a few remarks and then asked the attendees to give their name, agency, and position. She thanked Bonita White, Director, EEO Programs, DHHS, for sponsoring this meeting. 

 

She also thanked her staff for preparing an informational brochure of the Council, and for assigning an acronym for the organization – COFEE. 

 

EEOC Customer Service Survey

 

Jorge Ponce, Co-Chair of the Council, addressed the EEOC Customer Service Survey that the Council released in July 2005.  He thanked all the Council members who participated in the survey, and, specifically, Araybia Robinson in Ms. Johnson’s staff for receiving and aggregating the survey results.

 

Mr. Ponce clarified that this was not the first time that the Council had conducted a survey.  He indicated that the Council has issued various position papers in the past, including two that were based on surveys – one on the relationship between EEO Offices and Offices of General Counsel and another on Management Directive 715. 

 

While acknowledging that EEOC received high marks for its customer service, he discussed the survey responses that merited further consideration.

 

MD-715

 

Fifty-five percent of respondents opined that EEOC should extrapolate the statistical information for future Annual Reports on the Federal Work Force solely from the Central Personnel Data File (CPDF), or from its future replacement, the Enterprise Human Resources Integration (EHRI) system.  EEOC relied on the CPDF to prepare the 2004 Report, so there is already a precedent set.

 

In the Additional Suggestions portion of the survey, a respondent indicated that EEOC did not allow federal agencies to provide their comments to the draft version of MD-715, and subsequently refused to listen to concerns.  Another respondent stated that there was not any apparent coordination between EEOC and OPM regarding helping agencies to meet their MD-715 reporting requirements.

 

Mr. Ponce stated that the new EHRI system will allow users to retrieve information on age, agency, contact information, employee, investigation security clearance, payroll, performance appraisal, Race and National Origin (RNO), personnel action, position, and retirement. It will provide access to thirty-two years of employee data starting in FY 05, and will allow users to conduct various types of trend analyses regarding training information, RNO representation by grade and total workforce, most populous series, etc. Mr. Ponce indicated that the EHRI data is broken down by PATCOB categories.   Consequently, he predicted that customers (including executives, managers, supervisors, employees, and the general public) would much prefer to utilize the EHRI data rather than the new EEOC occupational categories that were introduced in 2004.  Another factor to consider is that the National Finance Center, where most federal agencies get their data dumps from, has indicated that it will continue relying on the PATCOB categories, and that it would only change to the new EEOC categories after OPM orders it to.  So far, OPM has continued relying on the PATCOB categories. 

 

For additional information on the EHRI, Mr. Ponce referred Council members to  http://www.opm.gov/egov/EHRI_overview.asp.

 

Consultation    

 

Seventy-four percent of respondents indicated that EEOC regularly sends them proposed regulations and other documents through regular mail, while sixty-eight percent of respondents preferred to get these documents electronically. Considering that postal offices after 9/11 irradiate all incoming mail and that this results in delays for mail distribution, respondents want EEOC to send them future correspondence via e-mail.

 

EEO Directors Meetings  

 

Eighty-seven percent of respondents thought it was a good idea for EEOC to ask for input from EEO professionals when developing the agenda for its quarterly EEO Directors meetings, while sixty-six percent of respondents indicated that EEOC sometimes adopted  the suggestions offered as agenda items for these meetings.  Moreover, fifty-three percent of respondents stated that they could not attend all the EEO Directors meetings, and eighty-two of respondents wanted EEOC to post the verbatim minutes of these meetings on its Web site.  Mr. Ponce stated that a verbatim transcript would be deleterious to the spontaneity of these meetings, so he referred to a suggestion in the Additional Suggestions part of the survey that called for a synopsis of the meetings. 

 

OPM Coordination

 

Seventy-one percent of respondents indicated that EEOC does not advise OPM sufficiently on the proper classification of EEO-related jobs, as required by Executive Order 12067, while eighty-two percent of respondents opined that EEOC should.  Mr. Ponce shared a position paper that a Navy EEO professional prepared regarding the placement of the EEO Program under the Human Resources Office. To view this position paper, click on the Navy Letter July 05 file.

 

Proactive Steps

 

Eighty-nine percent of respondents were not aware of instances where EEOC had made recommendations to OMB regarding the staff size and resource needs of EEO programs of federal agencies.  In the Additional Suggestions portion of the survey, a respondent stated that EEOC definitely should take advantage of the provisions of this Executive Order. 

 

Training

 

Sixty-six percent of respondents stated that EEOC does not provide sufficient EEO training, although sixty-one percent liked the content of previous EEOC training and considered the EEOC trainers to be subject-matter experts.  

 

MD-715 Presentation

 

Michael Gautier, an EEO employee at the Army, gave a presentation that focused on the cooperation that is necessary between the information technology personnel and the EEO staffs.