Council
Meeting
Held
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Host: Ms. Delia J. Johnson
INTRODUCTION
Ms. Delia L. Johnson, Co-Chair of
the Council and Director, Office of Civil Rights for International Broadcasting
Bureau, opened the meeting with a few remarks and then asked the attendees to
give their names, agencies, and positions.
iDoxSolutions, Inc.
Mike Thorp, Senior Consultant for
iDoxSolutions, Inc., gave a presentation on the services that his company
offered to clients who wanted to streamline their operations – especially those
who desired to transform their services from a paper-based environment to an
automated one.
To contact Mr. Thorp, you can do so
at 303 656-3022, or via e-mail at mthorp@idoxsolutions.com.
DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
Veronica Villalobos (Director,
Office of Diversity and Inclusion), Bruce Stewart (Deputy Director of Training,
Office of Diversity and Inclusion), and Sharon Wong (Deputy Director of
Coordination and Policy, Office of Diversity and Inclusion) gave a presentation
on Executive Order 13583 and the upcoming government-wide strategic plan on
diversity and inclusion.
Veronica, in explaining the backdrop
for the issuance of E. O. 13583, indicated that during previous
administrations, EEOC and OPM did not always work collaboratively on civil
rights issues. For example, while EEOC asked federal agencies to collect
applicant-flow data, OPM was cautious of the legal implications if collected.
With the election of President Obama, and the transfer of then EEOC
Commissioner Christine Griffin to OPM as its Deputy Director, OPM and EEOC
could work more collaboratively by educating HR professionals on the challenges
that EEO Directors constantly faced.
Veronica mentioned that OPM Director
John Berry had asked CHCO’s at the last meeting for their assistance and
support to implement the guidelines of E.O. 13583 in getting a coordinated
approach for HR and EEO professionals to monitor diversity and inclusion in the
Federal Government. OMB asked how much it would cost to implement said
coordinated approach, and OPM officials responded that although there would
some new costs involved, the majority of the recommendations could be
implemented by integrating the resources that agencies already had available.
Veronica explained that OPM plans to
issue three deliverables based on E.O. 13583: 1) a government-wide strategic
plan on diversity and inclusion by November 16, 2011; 2) a guidance document on
how to get from point A to point B; and, 3) a clarification of various
reporting requirements (OPM wants to reduce reporting requirements on
agencies). Veronica stated that federal agencies will be asked to submit their
own plans by March 15, 2012, and that HR Directors should seek the advice of
EEO Directors when crafting these plans.
Veronica clarified that diversity
includes much more than the traditional EEO Groups included in affirmative
action plans. Diversity also includes such things as geographic areas, schools
attended, veterans status, and sexual orientation. She
stated that some managers hire applicants who remind them of themselves which
is a cognitive error we all can make. This mindset does not lead to having a
workforce of the best and the brightest, and it must be changed.
Veronica explained how unconscious
biases can result in a lack of diversity at agencies. To illustrate her point,
she mentioned how the average height of a male in the U.S. is 5’10, while the
average height of a CEO in a Fortune 500 company is 6’3. Some selecting
officials erroneously equate being tall with having good leadership skills.
One of the things that Veronica
thinks is critical for the success of diversity initiatives is for the
inclusion of diversity and inclusion goals in the agencies’ strategic plans.
Veronica explained that
agency-specific diversity plans should address three goals: workforce
diversity, workplace inclusion, and sustainability.
Veronica stressed that good
recruitment should draw applicants from all segments of society and be based on
the merit principles. To remedy the underrepresentation of certain EEO groups,
agencies should look at actions consistent with 5 C.F.R. § 720.204(c) to ensure
that outreach efforts are effective in addressing barriers to employment.
Agencies should look at their applicant-flow data to verify that their vacancy
announcements are reaching all segments of America. One way to address barriers
to employment of certain EEO groups is to develop strategic partnerships with different
schools. She indicated that Special Employment Program Managers (SEPM’s) play a
key role in recruitment initiatives – as they are not just event planners. OPM
wants an elevation of the role that SEPM’s play. However, Veronica pointed out
that there is no “right” place where to house SEPM’s – some agencies have them
in HR, while others have them in EEO Offices. OPM is more concerned with the
impact and effectiveness of SEPM’s.
Veronica indicated how, from a
recruiting standpoint, simply posting a vacancy announcement on USAJOBS is not
enough to reach the broadest possible pool of highly qualified candidates. She
pointed out that currently the two EEO groups that remain underrepresented in
the federal workforce are Hispanics and persons with targeted disabilities.
Consequently, agencies should take a more proactive approach to recruitment and
use available hiring authorities to reach applicants from these two groups.
Some recruitment recommendations are to post advertisements in locations that
are likely to reach these groups, to use recruiters who belong to these groups,
and to aggressively use internship and fellowship programs to identify top
talent and convert them through permanent, non-competitive appointments.
Veronica announced that OPM had plans
to train approximately 4,000 SESers on diversity by
using Laura Listwood (author of the book “The Loudest
Duck”) for a 2-hr. workshop.
Sharon Wong handled the discussion
on workplace inclusion. She explained how you can recruit a diverse workforce
and still have no inclusion. The latter means connecting employees to the
organization by developing, promoting, and retaining them. She indicated how
initial impressions regarding employment orientation, assignments, performance
ratings and working conditions, as well as quality of life issues, play a major
role on whether the employee remains with an agency. Jorge Ponce indicated how
OPM Director described, at the September 28, 2011 meeting of the Hispanic
Council on Federal Employment, the meaning of inclusion by saying “It doesn't
help anyone to hire people because they're different, and then marginalize them
because they're not the same.”
Sharon indicated how a great way for
agency leaders to show that they walk the diversity and inclusion talk is by
ensuring the presence of diversity in their leadership positions – specifically
in the SES ranks. SES diversity offers hopes to applicants and employees that
advancement to the top levels is doable.
Other inclusion initiatives that Sharon
mentioned are: mentoring programs, telework opportunities, strong orientation
programs for employees and new SESers, and providing
affinity groups with access to the agency leadership.
Bruce Stewart closed the OPM
presentation by addressing sustainability, or embracing the necessary steps to
maintain a diverse workforce. He listed three sustainability priorities:
measuring accountability by having a job element on diversity and inclusion on
all employees’ performance plans; having agencies develop strategic action
plans for diversity and inclusion through their HR and EEO Directors, and
reporting agencies’ lack of progress to the President’s Management Council;
and, providing training on diversity and inclusion. He mentioned that OPM is
developing an online introductory training on Diversity & Inclusion.
Bruce concluded his remarks by
saying that for people to modify their views on diversity, they must first
change their “hearts.”
QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION FOR OPM
TEAM
A Council member asked who is going
to hold agencies accountable for implementing their strategic plans on
diversity and inclusion. Veronica responded that agencies should include a job
element on diversity and inclusion on the performance plans of all employees.
In addition, noncompliance with the plans will be discussed at the President’s
Management Council – where membership is at the level of the Deputy
Secretaries.
A Council member asked for an
example of a good job element on diversity and inclusion. Veronica said that
she favored a gradual approach when introducing this job element. Thus, she
suggested targeting SESers and supervisors first. She
cautioned that requiring goals is not legally sustainable.
A Council member asked what took
place between the first and second draft of the government-wide strategic plan
on diversity – as the second version was so much better than the first.
Veronica responded that the first draft was prepared by the Wolf Pack – a group
of agencies’ experts – while the second draft was enhanced by the feedback from
subject-matter professionals.
A Council member asked whether OPM
was evolving a definition of affirmative employment. Veronica indicated how
work related to EEO and affirmative action is important and must be continued,
as without it, diversity and inclusion would crumble.
A Council member from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture pointed out that the main reason for the recent
emphasis on affirmative employment, diversity, and inclusion was because of the
steep cost of discrimination complaints. She referred to an article in the
latest issue of Federal Times that showed how the U.S. Postal Service paid
$641M in settlements to disgruntled employees and former employees.
In reference to a request from a
federal agency to get an extension from OPM to submit its FEORP Report,
Veronica indicated that substance was more important than the length of the
reports.